Within an enterprise, this process means not just finding HTML documents on the company portal, but also discovering the content within all the file systems, databases and applications the company uses. Users then search against this index rather than against the actual Web content. On the Internet this is done through “spidering,” the process of following hyperlinks from one page to another and copying the content of those pages into a server for indexing. The first action, discovery, consists of finding exactly what content an enterprise has stashed away in its various datastores. While the exact feature set and methodology varies among different vendors, they perform three main functions: discovery, categorization and search. To help their employees and customers quickly access the information they need, companies spent $450 million on Enterprise Search Engines (ESE) last year, according to Susan Feldman, International Data Corp.’s research vice president for Content Management and Retrieval Software.Įnterprise Search Engines perform much the same function as Internet search engines, but targeted to the needs of a particular group of people rather than the broad public. “We estimate we save 78,000 staff hours per year in the engineering group alone by having rapid access to the documents.” “We had so much information out there in people’s heads or in complex directory structures - places where people don’t even know it exists,” says Bob Downing, Anadarko’s manager of business systems. Installing Convera’s RetrievalWare search engine changed all that. found that its engineers were spending as much as 50% of their time searching for information contained in the company’s 2 million document Intranet. Without the right tools, employees can spend a huge amount of time prospecting for this hidden data. Knowledge workers face a similar problem - finding the hidden gold buried somewhere amidst 3 billion-plus Internet pages as well as an organization’s own data stores. At Newmont Mining Corp.’s site near Battle Mountain, Nev., for example, the company must excavate and process 30 tons of raw material to extract a single ounce of pure gold. It is a lot of work but, done right, produces a high return. Oh, and my Garrett Carrot has the same performance, whether running with a 9v batter or 3 AAA batteries and my voltage booster.Mining for data is like mining for gold. I still need to test the F-Pulse on my soil, but I don't anticipate the real world results differing much from these air tests. Notice how the F-Pulse gives the same sensitivity on a copper coin when on medium sensitivity (while the Carrot is on max sensitivity), yet overloads or "bottoms out" at almost the same point the Carrot Carrot does on medium sensitivity.Īnd when the F-Pulse is on the lowest sensitivity, it has the same range as the Carrot on medium sensitivity, yet won't overload until the target is far closer to the probe's tip (when compared to the Carrot on medium sensitivity). Based on air testing so far, it looks like it will do that job. So I recently bought the Fisher F-Pule in the hopes that it would provide better range to coin-type targets, but either overload at the same point as the Garrett Carrot or at a point that's closer to the probe's tip. But it doesn't have the sensitivity I want, while still preventing the pinpointer from "overloading" (giving a solid tone or continuous vibrate) too soon. I've used the Garrett Carrot for a while and I like it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |